Authors Guidelines

​

Instructions for Authors

Authors should submit only papers that have been carefully proofread and polished. Before submission, please make sure that your paper is prepared using the ARJH paper template. This will ensure fast processing and publication. Acceptance or rejection notification will be sent to all authors. The ARJH invites contributions in the following categories:

1. Original research.

2. Survey/review articles, providing a comprehensive review on a scientific topic.

3. Fast Communications: Short, self-contained articles on ongoing research.

4. Technical Notes.

We accept extended versions of papers previously published in conferences and/or journals. Submitted papers MUST be written in English, not exceeding 11 double-column pages in ARJH format. Extra charges might be made for additional pages and/or formatting paper.

 

Peer Review Process

Peer review exists to ensure that journals publish good science. This benefits the entire scientific community. Sometimes scientists find the peer review process intimidating because it can lead to the rejection of their manuscript. Keep in mind that revisions and improvements are part of the publication process and actually help raise the quality of your manuscript.

Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review-they offer authors free advice.

The complete review process is expected to take a maximum of 11 working days after submission but can take longer depending on the number of papers currently in review. Authors can expect to hear from the journal's coordinator at least 4 notifications.

 

Step 1: The completed manuscript in a soft copy (.doc or .docx) format along with a signed copyright form (image, word format or digitally signed) should be submitted to editor@arjournalhub.com.

Step 2: Papers will be checked for basic requirements: 1- Fitting the journal's aims and scopes. 2- Having minimum acceptable quality. 3- Compliance with the journal's instructions for authors. The manuscript is then submitted to the committee chair to be assigned for review to two reviewers considered to have the expertise in the subject area of the manuscript for a careful, dispassionate review. The identity of the authors and their institutional affiliations will be concealed from the reviewers (blind peer review).

Step 3: Reviewers will review the paper for technical content, relevance, timeliness, and value to the readership. The manuscript will be adjudged into one of four categories: 1) accepted for publication 2) accepted with minor modifications, 3) accepted with major modifications and 4) not accepted. The results of the review will be communicated to the editor for onward transmission to the authors.

Step 4: If required, authors are to modify the manuscript in light of the reviewers' comments and suggestions and resubmit the manuscript.

Step 5: Authors will be asked to complete their registration (sending payment proof and the registration form).

Step 6: Papers will be prepared for publication by the publications department according to the journal's criteria.

Step 7: Papers will be archived in journal-dedicated servers and other scientific references according to their subjects.